Draft Outlook – Offensive Tackle
The following is part of a series profiling draft prospects who will potentially be available when the Browns are on the clock.
IAN LASCH
Offensive Tackle is as close to a can’t-miss proposition as exists in the NFL Draft. It’s easy to evaluate technique, and even guys who don’t work at the position they were drafted for can usually be at least serviceable starters elsewhere on the line. At #5 overall, the Browns may end up paying a bit more than they’d like for what would have to be their RT, since Joe Thomas has the left side pretty well locked up, but the likelihood of a complete bust is slim. Even in the later rounds, it’s not uncommon to find potential starters, though they may require a year or two to develop.
1st Round
Andre Smith, Alabama- 6’4”, 340
Smith is more or less the offensive equivalent of Shaun Rogers. He’s had trouble keeping his weight in check and comes with a reputation for taking some plays off, but if properly motivated, can be absolutely dominant, particularly because he’s so much more agile than his size would lead you to believe. He’s an absolute mauler in the run game. His combine was a disaster, and his pro day workout wasn’t a ton better, but he was only 325 at his pro day, which would leave him light enough to play tackle. If he can’t keep his weight in check, though, he may end up having to shift to the interior.
Michael Oher, Ole Miss- 6’5”, 309
Oher is quite possibly the most physically talented of all offensive linemen in this draft, but is still learning both his position and the game. He’s suffered through three different position coaches in four years at Ole Miss, which didn’t help his consistency, and would likely need extensive technique coaching in the NFL. I’ve included him because Cleveland’s new O-Line coach is one of the best at coaching technique, and Oher has jaw-dropping upside.
Early 2nd Round
Eben Britton, Arizona- 6’6”, 310
Britton is very physical on the line, and is a consistent run blocker. Pass protection can be an issue, as he can be beat by elite edge rushers. He’s played both LT and RT, and could probably handle himself inside. This sort of versatility could cause his stock to rise out of Cleveland’s reach here.
Mid 2nd Round
Phil Loadholt, Oklahoma- 6’8”, 343
Loadholt is an absolute monster of a tackle. You don’t often see guys his size coming out of college, particularly ones with experience playing LT. He’s much better suited for the right side in the pros, due to his sheer size and dominance in run blocking. His pass protection is an issue, particularly with speed rushers, and is likely too tall to shift to the inside if this becomes an issue. He’s also had two alcohol-related arrests which would need to be looked into.
4th Round
Augustus Parris, Kent State- 6’4”, 297
Parrish has been a solid LT throughout college, but only for a mid-level program. He’d need to either add bulk to play RT or on the inside or play in a zone blocking scheme, but he could develop into a decent tackle.
Fenuki Tupou, Oregon- 6’6”, 328
Tupou has good quickness for his size and is a good blocker. He moves well for his size to make blocks on the second level in the running game. His talent was enough to make coaches shift Max Unger to center, but his work ethic and character have both been questioned.
6th Round
Jason Watkins, Florida- 6’6”, 317
Watkins is versatile, having played on both ends of the O-line after having started out as a tight end. He can reach the second level more quickly than most guys his size, but his pass protection is marginal at best. He’s still very raw, only having played two years of high school football, so could improve with more experience and coaching.
Gerald Cadogan, Penn State- 6’4”, 315
Cadogan is another road-grader type who’d fit best on the right side after having played LT in college. He can lose his balance at times, which leads to bad plays, and may be better suited to shifting inside where he has help.
Andrew Gardner, Georgia Tech- 6’6”, 302
Gardner is a hard worker and gives great effort. He’s played through injuries and is a guy teams can count on. He’ll need to build strength if he’s going to shift to the right side of the line, and may always have trouble sliding in front of speed rushers in pass protection.
Garrett Reynolds, UNC- 6’7”, 310
Reynolds isn’t very athletic for an offensive tackle prospect, but he’s tough, reliable, and gives every play his all. He sustains blocks well, but can be poor at blocking on the run. His father and uncle were both pros, and with coaching, he could stick.
Undrafted Free Agents
Joel Bell, Furman- 6’7”, 312
Bell is still very, very raw, but has tons of upside. He’s dominated the lower-level competition he’s faced in the FCS. With coaching, he could even turn into a starter, or at least a serviceable backup.
Robert Brewster, Ball State- 6’4”, 312
Brewster played with a mean streak, but mostly out of a two-point stance. It’s uncertain whether he’d be able to make the switch to a pro-style blocking scheme, but for as solid a performer as he was in college, someone should take a chance on him.
As it Stands Now – Offensive Tackle
The following is part of a series profiling the Browns’ current depth chart entering the NFL Draft.
DAVE KOLONICH
The evolution of the NFL athlete has undergone a remarkable shift in the past several years, as some of the best talent coming out of college lies on the defensive side of the ball. Witness the changes around the league in defensive schemes, as amazing athletes such as Dwight Freeney, Julius Peppers, Osi Umenyiora, Mario Williams, DeMarcus Ware and Shawne Merriman have dominated offensive lines in recent years. These players have effectively destroyed the myth of the “franchise left tackle”, simply because no offensive lineman can match their athletic abilities.
Joe Thomas is not the exception to this rule.
I know it may be sacreligious to criticize the Browns’ 2-time Pro Bowl left tackle, but Thomas does not have the skill set to neutralize the likes of these players. Some clear examples of this were shown in the 2008 season, as Thomas struggled mightily against Williams and Freeney, as well as Pittsburgh’s James Harrison. However, in Thomas’ defense, there is no one in the league at the moment, with the exception of Seattle’s still unheralded Walter Jones, who stands a chance against these freakish monsters.
I am not advocating releasing or trading Joe Thomas, because simply he is already one of the best left tackles in the AFC. Also considering the Browns’ recent history of mediocre offensive line play, Thomas could be viewed as a savior. Probably the best way to evaluate Thomas’ worth is to compare his play to left tackles of the past, including the likes of Kevin Shaffer, L.J. Shelton, Enoch DeMar, Roman Oben and various other injury replacements. Thomas offers the kind of stability the position hasn’t seen since the days of Paul Farren, or even Doug Dieken.
Like most recent college left tackles entering the NFL, Thomas’ skills lie in the areas of run blocking. His size, strength and athleticism make him a very effective blocker in both straight ahead and pulling type of schemes. Also, Thomas can neutralize the likes of average pass rushers, as his footwork is far superior to other left tackles around the league. For this, I am grateful. Thomas is a cornerstone of the Browns franchise. And to think…Phil Savage almost gave away the 2007 draft in order to get JaMarcus Russell.
Left tackle is solid…now, right tackle is another story.
The release of Kevin Shaffer was a bit surprising, but makes perfect sense when analyzing the external factors surrounding the move. First, Shaffer was due a roster bonus, so the move could be viewed as financial. Also, we have new bosses in town who are eager to leave their individual stamp on the team. Obviously, Shaffer was a Phil Savage signing, with no ties to Mangini or Kokonis. In this sense, the move was a natural.
Second, Shaffer’s skill set never really matched any particular position. Shaffer began his career playing left tackle in a zone blocking scheme in Atlanta. His weaknesses were masked by the constant movement associated with an Alex Gibbs system. Shaffer’s average size and quickness were not a problem in a system that does not require lengthy periods of isolated blocking. However in Cleveland, Shaffer was exposed on a left tackle island in 2006. Although Shaffer was not a total bust protecting the quarterback, the comparison between his play in 2006 and Thomas’ in 2007 was remarkable. However, Joe Thomas never had the experience of protecting an undersized MAC quarterback who held onto the ball for days at a time.
Moving Shaffer to the right side of the line is still a move that baffles me. Shaffer is simply not a true run-blocking offensive lineman. He was adequate in these duties, but did not excel. Also, the traditional flaw in Shaffer’s game was again exposed by quicker defensive ends in 2008. Shaffer, who bulked up considerably during his time in Cleveland, was abused by pass rushers last season. The skills he never developed on the left side of the line quickly found him again on the right side. This was obvious to the Romeo Crennel led coaching staff, as Shaffer was often spelled during games by Ryan Tucker.
Ryan Tucker is one of those types of players who would be perfectly cast in an Aliens or Predator type of movie as the tough-guy Special Forces agent who ignores the warnings of his logical squad leader and rushes into a danger zone before getting his limbs tore apart. Tucker has always struck me as the type of player who will live out his post-NFL days in a Nick Nolte/North Dallas Forty crippled, pain-killer addled stupor. Simply put, Tucker has been slowly falling apart the past 4-5 years.
However, when Tucker is in the Browns lineup, he somehow solidifies the line. The 2007 season and the Browns dominance of the Giants on Monday Night last year are perfect examples of Tucker’s value to the team. Tucker remains the only Browns’ lineman who maximizes his skills, while playing with a nasty mean streak that is straight out of the 1960’s or 1970’s. The only drawback to Tucker’s style of play is his tendency to get hurt….often.
While I agree with the Shaffer release, I don’t agree with initial reports that point to Tucker replacing Shaffer at the right tackle position. While Tucker is the Browns’ best run blocker, he is not athletic enough to handle quick defensive ends, especially on obvious passing downs. The best position for Tucker remains inside, playing at right guard. But as the roster stands now, Tucker is penciled in at right tackle, unless the Browns draft some offensive linemen.
With an eye to eventually replacing Tucker (most likely because of injury), the Browns have signed Floyd Womack. Playing in Seattle, Womack enjoyed the luxury of anonymity, especially since the bulk of the Seahawks’ offensive line attention goes to future Hall of Famer Walter Jones. While Jones can handle his own business individually on the left side of the line, Womack, Sean Locklear and other right side linemen needed the help of tight ends and chipping running backs to neutralize their side of the line. Also, Womack played in a West Coast style system that emphasized 3-step drop backs and quick passes. West Coast style offenses often help to mask offensive linemen’s weaknesses.
The Womack signing may not be groundbreaking, but considering the hole created by Shaffer’s release and the injury likelihood associated with Tucker’s play, this could prove to be an important move by the Browns. Adding to this, the depth currently on the line is pretty much non-existent.
His name is Isaac Sowells.
Pork Chop and Barton
On a related note, Isaac Sowells just cracked open a bag of Cheetos.
Legacies and Good Sense
First, we already know Jurevicius and Shaffer have been cut. Although Jurevicius was a very productive third down receiver during the 2007 season, his recent troubles with injuries and infection have rendered his career mostly dead. As for Shaffer, he has always been a tweener, in terms of size and ability. His body has expanded into the size required of a right tackle, but his reaction time has suffered in recent years. Shaffer seems like a good guy, but doesn’t really fit into any position along the offensive line. He is too slow to be a tackle and not strong enough to play inside.
THE GHOST OF JAMAL LEWIS
DONTE’S CIRCLE OF HELL
ORDINARY JOE
RICH FAT GUYS
And finally, DA…Let’s leave this for the coming breakdown of the Quarterback position. But in the meantime, go ahead and cut him.
R.I.P. Kevin Shaffer
Quick, let’s go sign a left-handed quarterback.
Wants and Needs
DAVE KOLONICH
One of the joys of my life is reading Michael Lombardi’s columns in The National Football Post. A former NFL executive, Lombardi offers experienced commentary and analysis that is accurate, intelligent and thought-provoking. Also, Lombardi delivers his smart commentary in a logical and more importantly, rational manner. Unlike the draft clowns of ESPN, with their staged disagreements, or the husky ex-linemen who feel that intelligence is measured by how softly they can speak, Lombardi simply informs his readers. I challenge anyone to find a more insightful NFL voice in the media today.
And yes, I have a thing for Lombardi. Deal with it.
Yesterday’s Diner Morning News Post is a classic example of Lombardi’s common sense approach to the league. Take a look.
I always felt that you had to attempt to cover your team needs before the draft so that you could enter the draft with the intention of taking the best player.
What a novel idea. Besides the Patriots, look at the other teams that follow this formula: Pittsburgh, Indy, Philadelphia, NY Giants and San Diego. They have systems in place and they have fully realized that the development of players is key to their success. This is critical in both building roster stability, as well as preserving draft picks, not to mention avoiding costly salary cap issues. If you point to last year’s draft, look at what Carolina did…they reached. Carolina had a huge hole at running back and along the offensive line, so they made a very expensive trade which cost them draft picks. What the Panthers received was a solid O-lineman and a good running back. What they gave up was the potential stability extra draft picks usually afford.
If you look at the above mentioned stable teams, these franchises rarely trade up to grab a player. If anything, these are the teams who traditionally trade down in the draft in an attempt to stockpile extra draft picks. New England is the classic example, as they routinely trade down from higher draft positions (usually acquired in previous trades) and score solid players in the mid-rounds. The teams don’t need these later draft picks to contribute right away, leaving them time to develop in each team’s respective system. These teams’ systems reflect a logical approach to team-building, as all have largely kept the same coaches and front office personnel in place, ensuring smooth transitions from experienced, expensive players to younger, cheaper ones.
The Patriots have a complete team ready to compete in the NFL before the draft.
Just focus on the above statement. How many NFL teams can make a similar claim? If the season started today, the Patriots could legitimately compete based on last year’s roster, and this spring’s free agent signings. Add to this the fact that the Patriots have only made a few roster additions, mainly adding secondary help, and this becomes even more remarkable.
The Patriots will enter next month’s draft much like they have entered the last few…with options. Although the Patriots have some needs defensively, none are glaring enough to warrant making risky trades in order to grab one particular player. The Patriots can simply watch the draft unfold and wait for the opportunity to grab extra picks by trading down. What other teams in the NFL can operate in such a calm, precise manner on draft day? Pittsburgh, the Giants? How about the Browns?
Just thinking about that question should force the most dispassionate Browns fan’s head to explode. The current roster has more holes than an Arizona border fence overlooking a Wal-Mart. The importance of this year’s draft is critical to the Browns’ future success, as the team’s needs outweigh its wants. Certainly, this is not an ideal situation for the Browns, as this is one time the organization cannot try to emulate the Patriots. While the Patriots will be relaxed, the Browns need to scramble in order to fill their roster. This should be the first test to determine if our new administration is pointing the team in the right direction.
With this idea in mind, let’s take an incredibly quick look at the Browns needs entering the draft. In the coming days, we will further break down these needs:
QB - Really? We need to pick one of the two we already have. Unless this guy has his way:
Russ Lande of The Sporting News is Kind of an Idiot
RB – Pretty much. We have a high-mileage car and one that’s never been driven.
WR – Yes, unless you’re a Syndric Steptoe fan. (I’m not even sure Syndric Steptoe is a fan of Syndric Steptoe.)
TE - We’re actually good here. For now.
OL – Yes, please. Before I die, I would like to see the Browns draft another Round 1 offensive lineman.
DL – And again.
OLB – Of course. Can we trade Wimbley back in?
ILB – And D’Quell and Leon?
CB – I wouldn’t flinch if the Browns drafted one at #5.
S – Oh, God yes.
ST – You don’t draft Special Teams.
So, looking at the Browns needs entering the draft, we are pretty rock solid with the following:
DON’T NEED:
-We don’t need a Tight End (at least not yet)
-You just don’t draft Kickers or Punters.
-Let’s not draft another quarterback (unless we can find a good one).
DO NEED:
-Everything else.
Good thing our new coach wants to build through the draft. Not so good that he wants to do it with this team.
R.I.P. Joe Jurevicius
The Greening of Cleveland
As the “greening” of our Cleveland Browns continues with the recent signings of ex-Jets C.J. Mosley, Abram Elam, David Bowens, Hank Poteat and the potential of bringing onboard Eric Barton, the staff of Cleveland Reboot sought council from someone who can offer insight into these players, as well as breaking news:
Brian from http://www.thejetsblog.com/ offers the following insight regarding our new Browns/ex-Jets:
I like all the players but within confined usage, for the Jets only Elam was ever a consistent starter. Mosley is a great sub-package lineman with ability to get pressure on the QB, but he’s still young and getting better, but he’s undersized to play three downs as a 3-4 DL.
Bowens is a fantastic wedge-buster and blocker on special teams and comes up with big plays on defense, but again is great as a sub-package end.
Poteat is a capable nickel player, but isn’t a starter quality corner and Elam is solid in run blocking and playing around the line of scrimmage. (He) is an out and out liability when ranging in coverage.
Here’s a great example of Elam’s coverage
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4sxkXH6gZ08&hl=en&fs=1]
I can’t imagine many Browns fans bursting with excitement based on the preceding, although Elam did deliver a crushing blow…to his teammate, but at least the team is finally addressing its defensive needs. These are not game-changing players, but Mosley, Bowens and Elam offer depth, experience and toughness. Also, Mosley and Elam are still young players, who may not have tapped into their full potential yet. These may not be groundbreaking signings, but at least it’s something.
Poteat, Barton and Waterloo
Life of Reilly – Mailing it in Edition

















The Expendables: Browns Edition
Thursday Best: Rumor Has It Edition
The New Look Cavaliers
2010 Mid-Preseason Awards
Two Afternoons After: Browns-Rams Edition
Ten Events of Happenstance: Browns-Rams Edition
Browns-Rams Preview
The Reverse Curse
Thursday Roundup: Opportunity Knocking Edition
Wednesday Roundup: Walking Wounded Edition